My Actual Homepage - Go here for more info.


I plan to put a graphical banner here eventually...

11 December 2010

Did I just hear another gap close?

I have often argued, as have others, that the entire concept of god(s) is a god of the gaps argument.  Every religious figure that supposedly plays a part in this universe is constantly being replaced by natural phenomena, and our better understanding of the world.  Look at rainbows, thunder, rain, etc.  All those fables have now been replaced by repeatable and understandable science.  Never once in the history of thought has the opposite happened.  Right now, two of the most comfortable gaps that the ideas of god(s) hides in are the actual origin of the big bang and abiogenesis.  Hence why I found it interesting that it seems one of the comfortable gaps seems to be falling victim to knowledge and science.

Fascinating New Theory: "The Universe Could Have Been Created from Nothing"

6a00d8341bf7f753ef00e54f1c62458833-800wi Using an ultra-high-intensity laser beam and a two-mile-long particle accelerator—it could be possible to create something out of nothing, according to University of Michigan researchers who developed new equations that show how a high-energy electron beam combined with an intense laser pulse could rip apart a vacuum into its fundamental matter and antimatter components, and set off a cascade of events that generates additional pairs of particles and antiparticles.

“We can now calculate how, from a single electron, several hundred particles can be produced. We believe this happens in nature near pulsars (image) and neutron stars,” said Igor Sokolov, with the Space Physics Research Laboratory in the Department of Atmospheric, Oceanic and Space Sciences who conducted this research along with associate research scientist John Nees, emeritus electrical engineering professor Gerard Mourou and their colleagues in France. In Chandra's image (above), the colors of red, green, and blue are mapped to low, medium, and high-energy X-rays. At the center, the bright blue dot is likely the neutron star that astronomers believe formed when the star exploded. For several years astronomers have struggled to understand the behavior of the this object, which exhibits unusually large variations in its X-ray emission over a period of years. Astronomer's at the Harvard X-Ray Telescope took the image showing the 2,000 year-old-remnant of such a cosmic explosion, known as RCW 103, which occurred about 10,000 light years from Earth.

“It is better to say, following theoretical physicist Paul Dirac, that a vacuum, or nothing, is the combination of matter and antimatter—particles and antiparticles.Their density is tremendous, but we cannot perceive any of them because their observable effects entirely cancel each other out,” Sokolov added. Matter and antimatter destroy each other when they come into contact under normal conditions.

“But in a strong electromagnetic field, this annihilation, which is typically a sink mechanism, can be the source of new particles,” Nees said, “In the course of the annihilation, gamma photons appear, which can produce additional electrons and positrons.”

The researchers describe this work as a theoretical breakthrough, and a “qualitative jump in theory.”

An experiment in the late ’90s managed to generate from a vacuum gamma photons and an occasional electron-positron pair. These new University of Michigan equations take this work a step farther to model how a strong laser field could promote the creation of more particles than were initially injected into an experiment through a particle accelerator.

“If an electron has a capability to become three particles within a very short time, this means it’s not an electron any longer,” Sokolov said. “The theory of the electron is based on the fact that it will be an electron forever. But in our calculations, each of the charged particles becomes a combination of three particles plus some number of photons.”

The researchers have developed a tool to put their equations into practice in the future on a very small scale using the HERCULES laser at U-M. To test their theory’s full potential, a HERCULES-type laser would have to be built at a particle accelerator such as the SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory at Stanford University, which is not currently planned.

“The basic question of what is a vacuum, and what is nothing, goes beyond science,” he said. “It’s embedded deeply in the base not only of theoretical physics, but of our philosophical perception of everything—of reality, of life, even the religious question of could the world have come from nothing.”
Casey Kazan via University of Michigan

2 comments:

oldman said...

Christian apologists have, for a long time, been arguing that something can't come from nothing. Ironically, their almighty god would've had to create the universe in exactly that way. But Physics seems to work just fine by itself. No god(s) required.

Unknown said...

It does surprise me that they use that argument without applying it to their own fantasy creation. Although, I am sure that then they get afraid of the turtles all the way down conundrum. I do need to post the other gap closing article. BRB. :)