Xtiantity: The belief that a cosmic jewish zombie who was his own father can make you live forever if you symbolically eat his flesh and telepathically tell him you accept him as your master, so he can remove an evil force from your soul that is present in humanity because a rib-woman was convinced by a talking snake to eat from a magical tree... yeah, that makes perfect sense...
Speaking of that verse... Both xtians and skeptics focus on the resurrection of jesus as the “extraordinary” event. But the tombs opening and dead people walking around are just as incredible (literally), if not more so. If all these dead people were walking around, why is it only mentioned once in ancient history — and that one time is in a biased, anonymous story about the life of jesus written generations after it happened?
Dead people rising and walking around would have had people talking. And yet no one seems to have thought to mention it except the gospel of matthew.
What’s odd is that many of the people who believe this story refuse to believe in evolution, claiming it has no evidence. What hypocrisy and inconsistency!
2 comments:
Hey Lunkster,
It seems that the Rockin Apologist stumpled upon your blog entry and wrote an entry on it.
Link
LOL. Nice strawman entry.
Here is my reply to him. I don;'t intend to go back to his pathetic page to follow up since you two are in a mutual mental masturbation circle there, and it isn't worth further effort. (And really, "Apologist"? Really, just the name itself should be a clue as to the validity of your and his position...)
1.) What relevance is that comparison?
2.) So? Ah, I guess they are stealing form Paul to pay Peter?
3.) Oh, so there is a pyramid scheme where the 10% goes up to the diocese. How does that really address the collection of wealth again? And the utilization rates are just horrible for the buildings and employees if you look at it. They work less than the French!
4.) The numbers I quoted were from actuals. So again, how does that relate?
5.) Relevance?
6.) I never asserted that. If anything, it's the poor parishes sending money to the Vatican.
7.) Again, that is not what I said. Check the bankbook of Jim Skinner instead.
8.) I actually acknowledged that in my post. Why do theitards have such a problem with reading comprehension?
9.) So what? It's not like they are doing things that a secular group can't possibly do. If anything, they do it less efficiently.
What I find incredibly amusing is all this talk in response to a COMEDY routine. I suppose sarcasm and parody is beyond your comprehension.
Post a Comment